Being a visual anthropologist
- tplye2
- Sep 2, 2023
- 6 min read
Updated: Oct 5, 2023
by Lye Tuck-Po
2 September 2023
(hopefully this will be the first of many articles on the subject. Please leave a line below if you would like to hear about any topic in anthropological photography)
I'm often asked about my photography "how-tos" (how do you do it? what kind of cameras do you use? do you follow a theme or do you just take photos as you find them? etc etc). The questions haven't abated in these fifteen years so it's time to dust off (meaning revisit and revise) an old article I wrote on the subject.
This article is especially for anthropologists and other seasoned fieldworkers. I'm not going into a heavy discussion about the power relations inherent in "capturing" images of the Other; for that you'll have to turn to one of the media anthropology blogs (see John Postill's, for example, though I have no idea whether he addresses power relations or not). These are just some tips and words of advice from someone who "went digital" in 2005 (relatively late).
First off, I should confess that I go through peaks and troughs — sometimes I go for years without any love for what I'm doing. I just take out the camera and ... shoot. I think the last time (meaning the most recent) I felt any love of photography was in Myanmar (2017) and George Town, Penang (2019).

That said, I've survived taking a DSLR (digital single lens reflex) to the field. I now use a full frame camera, the Nikon D750. It's got all the bells and whistles that I've barely explored. It also shoots video. I also have a Sony mirrorless camera, which is compact and easy to use, but has too much many of the bells and whistles locked in for me (meaning I like a camera that is fully manual). But the main second camera I use is the one on my mobile phone, a Blackview rugged phone.

(1) If your camera is a small point-and-shoot (PS), chuck it in your bag along with notebook and take it everywhere with you.
(2) If it's not a small PS (e.g., a relatively chunky DSLR like my Nikon D750), chuck it in anyway, which leads to:
(3) Find a sturdy travel bag / camera bag that can hold camera, spare batteries, spare memory cards, notebook(s), pens, purse or wallet, and other odds and ends.

A standard rusksack or bookbag works, but I personally don't like having to unshoulder and rummage for the camera when I'm in a hurry. I now use either a shoulder bag or Lowepro backpack. To me field photography means being able to respond quickly with the camera. When I'm walking in the forest with the Batek, I'll have the camera slung around the neck and someone else will carry the rest of the gear in the camera bag. I make no apologies; after all, I pay them for carrying services!
(4) Rainproof everything. Especially if your field is in the wet humid tropics and renowned for its hydrological richness. Always have a few air-tight plastic bags at the ready (ziplocks, to use the brand name). Also useful for dusty conditions. In Cambodia I always kept my DSLR wrapped even when inside the bag. Lots of river-crossings in shallow boats, see, and lots of dust in the dry season.

(5) Cameras can be intrusive and disruptive. It's a tradeoff between taking pictures and going with the flow. Except when you're ordered to take photos by the people, as has happened to me several times, both in Malaysia and Cambodia. I think my Cambodian friends considered me a cheap source of commemorative images but, hey, I didn't mind.
(6) Digital cameras need charging (the camera doesn't, but the battery does). It helps to have electricity. Where there's none, it's worth looking into installing solar power. I had a PV system in Cambodia and was happy with it. So did I in Sarawak and in my current work with the Batek.

(7) For my photographic taste, I'd want a good camera, a DSLR in the "prosumer" class at least, but size and weight are important considerations if your fieldwork involves a lot of mobility (especially if you have to walk a lot). So far I haven't suffered too much with my cameras: had a car in Cambodia, and when not surveying by car, used motorbikes, bicycles, and boats. Didn't walk that much, which had deleterious effects on my weight. Now, using a full-frame camera, I've just got used to it.
(8) Impact factor: the bigger the camera (and the lenses), the bigger your marker of wealth. That can cause all kinds of symbolic problems: are you rich or poor, are you an anthropologist or photographer, can you be all of these things and accepted by the host community? (Actually, forget "poor": if you can travel to a remote area for fieldwork, you'll never be poor by local standards.) No easy answers here. Just something you have to deal with on a case-by-case basis. Hopefully your charm will disarm all comers. Basic rule of thumb is: don't try to be what you're not.

Thanks. Makes sense to me. I must break down and buy (and learn to use) a solar power system as Agta were, are and will be off the grid. Makes sense anyway. Also good thoughts as I am moving out of the pandemic isolation into a bit of travel and must re-camera. My Canon camera is dead in the water. And so on. I hope to see lots more on this very attractive web site. It should attract lots of attention and be of use to students.